Don't want either of them.
He might be an ugly sod but Dowie has the best track record and experience in the situation we find ourselves in. Not ideal I know but beggars can't be choosers. And we need immediate results. Just think that Ince with his attitude and 'Big time Charlie' routine wouldn't fit in in Norfolk at all. And even if he was a success (which I don't think he would be) he'd soon f**k off as soon as anyone else sniffed around him. The problem is there is no ideal candidate that ticks all the boxes. Whoever the board picks it will alienate a certain percentage of City fans. But what do I know?
Posted By: South stand corner on January 20th 2009 at 22:08:41
Message Thread
- A lot of anti Ince Stuff around (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 20, 21:50:42
- Ince would be a big mistake (NCFC) - caffrey, Jan 20, 22:11:06
- who would your choice be? I assume it isn't Gunn (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellow_Monkey, Jan 20, 22:29:05
- Agreed. And despite coming straight from a joke of a Premiership club (NCFC) - South stand corner, Jan 20, 22:18:28
- i'm in favour of him (NCFC) - ingi, Jan 20, 21:59:14
- i prefer him to curbs, jewell, gunn, worthy and a load of others.... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 20, 22:02:26
- Absolutely agree, although I'm getting worried that Gunny is going to get the job (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellow_Monkey, Jan 20, 22:00:20
- Don't want either of them. (NCFC) - South stand corner, Jan 20, 22:08:41
- Ince would be a big mistake (NCFC) - caffrey, Jan 20, 22:11:06
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.