I think he was asked if the short list was close to the bookies

favourites, to which he replied not at all.

This could of course mean anything. It doesn't mean that none of the favourites are on the list. Likewise, nor does it suggest that they are all on it.

Please don't read anything into his comments, they won't and should not reveal anything.

Posted By: trueyellow on January 18th 2009 at 15:52:13

Message Thread

Doncasters Comments Yesterday (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jan 18, 15:22:14
- I think he was asked if the short list was close to the bookies (NCFC) - trueyellow, Jan 18, 15:52:13
  - Here's a thought for you (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jan 18, 15:56:24
- Phil Neale is on a par with roeder (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 18, 15:40:19
- alternatively, (NCFC) - Dave in France, Jan 18, 15:29:27
- Or they've played the 'little ol Norwich' card to us all, and it's... (NCFC) - Arganth, Jan 18, 15:25:49
  - I Reckon Klinsmann Would "Get" Norfolk (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jan 18, 15:32:31
    - Ling has Norfolk connections (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jan 18, 15:45:56
      - Yeah, it's between Reepham and Dereham. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Jan 18, 15:55:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.