i thought our bad results were the board's fault - Wrath of the Barclay

i thought our bad results were the board's fault

and roeder had little effect on them.

apparently nobody could do a better job, but i'm now wondering if anyone could do a worse one after today.

Posted By: SCC 28 on January 18th 2009 at 02:11:36

Message Thread

sack the board (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 18, 01:15:47
- Atleast we now know they are searching for a boss (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 18, 02:06:54
  - i thought our bad results were the board's fault (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 18, 02:11:36
    - one result as you well know does not make a season (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 18, 02:18:40
      - yeah but no coincidence imo (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 18, 02:21:37
        
        you say hardly drifting, if I were now to lay off I'd be red (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 18, 02:23:01
        
        well your fault for backing him so low (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 18, 02:25:01
        
        had a dream he went out 1st round ffs (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 18, 02:30:11
        
        it is when you'd get bigger combined odds (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 18, 02:31:28
        
        yeah, that would good be a good point (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 18, 10:36:24
        
        by doing the fucking maths! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 18, 10:40:54
        
        come on then (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 18, 10:42:27
        
        4.29 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 18, 10:44:40
        
        not a chance he'd be 1.02 vs melzer or nishi in r3 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 18, 10:45:12
        
        Ok, if you are correct then I agree and I must lay off instantly (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 18, 10:46:54
        
        well not really (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 18, 10:48:59

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.