are you retarded.
They did have only an 8% chance of making the playoffs
And it had nothing to do with them winning or losing.
They needed two other teams to both lose or beating DAL was meaningless.
Do you understand basic math.
TB was a -800 fav over OAK meaning a fair probability was 88% winning SU.
You continue to spout about stuff you have no clue about.
Whats new.
Posted By: usacanary on January 11th 2009 at 21:04:47
Message Thread
- calling usa canary (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:54:22
- are you retarded. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 21:04:47
- i only asked if you'd had a bet (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:06:17
- and if you didn't lay the eagles i'm pleased (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:08:13
- and the 8% chance was only reflective of the odds (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:13:57
- Oh god......... its official (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 21:21:39
- i heard they were difficult to beat yes (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:24:21
- what stunningly stupid logic. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 21:38:25
- it's all about spotting value at the end of the day (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:41:26
- You arn't very good at this (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 21:57:37
- MATHS (n/m) (Betting) - Small, Jan 11, 23:28:04
- if you thought the line was wrong (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:58:58
- LOL! (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 22:22:10
- seems a bit OTT (n/m) (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 22:28:55
- i think we know who just lost that argument mate (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 22:32:47
- and then yesterday (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 22:33:42
- i think we know who just lost that argument mate (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 22:32:47
- seems a bit OTT (n/m) (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 22:28:55
- LOL! (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 22:22:10
- and that's why I am a man (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 21:43:09
- indeed (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:44:47
- 1.7 next time they meet (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 21:45:50
- joint favs for the aussie... (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:47:13
- Lumping on? (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 21:50:46
- joint favs for the aussie... (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:47:13
- 1.7 next time they meet (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 21:45:50
- indeed (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:44:47
- You arn't very good at this (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 21:57:37
- it's all about spotting value at the end of the day (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:41:26
- what stunningly stupid logic. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 21:38:25
- i heard they were difficult to beat yes (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:24:21
- Oh god......... its official (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 21:21:39
- and the 8% chance was only reflective of the odds (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:13:57
- and if you didn't lay the eagles i'm pleased (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:08:13
- i only asked if you'd had a bet (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:06:17
- 2 score ball game (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:54:52
- *posession (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:56:05
- are you retarded. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 21:04:47
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.