I already said we are going down imo, not because we are crap

but because we are playing well and losing...

Posted By: Trousers on December 13th 2008 at 17:06:22

Message Thread

Roeder Got it Right Today (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 13, 16:49:32
- ? (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Dec 13, 16:55:26
- It was the right side to get a 0-0 draw, unfortunately (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 13, 16:53:34
  - yet we have a great knack of getting shit ones (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 16:54:39
- He obviously didn't get it right because we are losing! (n/m) (NCFC) - TheFineCity, Dec 13, 16:51:15
  - Team was applauded off (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 13, 16:56:17
    - We seem to very 'unlucky' recently. An unluckyness which has put us near the bottom of (NCFC) - TheFineCity, Dec 13, 16:57:41
      - people just love excuses (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 16:58:04
    - we hear that most weeks (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 16:56:59
  - fucking hell (NCFC) - Norfolk un Way, Dec 13, 16:53:11
  - Fuck up (n/m) (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 16:53:02
    - Interesting argument... (n/m) (NCFC) - TheFineCity, Dec 13, 16:54:04
      - About as sensible as your comment (n/m) (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 16:55:05
        
        So Glenn got it right today did he, maybe you'd like to explain that a bit further... (NCFC) - TheFineCity, Dec 13, 16:56:04
        
        Bad luck again wasn't it. Glen didn't ask Fozzy to handball... (n/m) (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 16:57:13
        
        Yes it was bad luck we didn't play any strikers, quite obviously your logic is undeniable! (n/m) (NCFC) - TheFineCity, Dec 13, 16:59:30
        
        Don't 100% disagree, but you are a moany old cunt. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 17:02:28
        
        Yes better to stick your head in the sand and hope for the best, always works! (n/m) (NCFC) - TheFineCity, Dec 13, 17:03:55
        
        I already said we are going down imo, not because we are crap (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 17:06:22
        
        you think one the bottom 3 can finish above us? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 17:08:59
        
        Fuck me, you're not being ever so slightly positive? (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 17:13:12
        
        how is that positive? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 17:13:53
        
        LOL - True to form, thats the correct answer SCC (n/m) (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 17:15:46
        
        Pattison and Russell missed sitters by the sounds of it. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Dec 13, 17:00:32
        
        Reading are a decent side with a good home record (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Dec 13, 17:02:43
        
        exactly (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 17:01:49
        
        Lupoli clinical? Koroma? Who exactly?? (n/m) (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 17:03:34
        
        russell?! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 17:04:31
        
        I know; but like I said SCC - WHO???? (n/m) (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 17:08:31
        
        you have to play what you have (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 17:09:27
        
        Are you his agent? (n/m) (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 17:12:02
        
        so you think russell is a better front man? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 17:12:55
        
        Lupoli too lightweight on his own.... (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 17:14:44
  - everyone was mystified at the selection (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 16:52:32
    - Agreed, the hand in the sand attitude of this place never fails to amaze me. (n/m) (NCFC) - TheFineCity, Dec 13, 16:55:18
  - Bit harsh - last 5 mins to a dodgy pen! Can't really legislate for that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Boris Johnson MP, Dec 13, 16:52:04
    - Well you can, by playing strikers and scoring goals, scoring 2 sort of legislates that (NCFC) - TheFineCity, Dec 13, 16:53:36
      - Yes but obviously Roeder didn't pick his team with prior knowledge of Reading's goals. (NCFC) - Boris Johnson MP, Dec 13, 16:55:42
        
        A manager choosing strikers to play in his team is topsy turvy? (NCFC) - TheFineCity, Dec 13, 17:02:58
- yep not playing any strikers worked great (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 16:50:51
  - don't be a prat all your life (n/m) (NCFC) - foulsham canary, Dec 13, 16:54:04
    - so everyone who was mysified with the line up (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 16:55:07
  - Shut the Fuk Up You stupid Ass (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 13, 16:52:02
    - russell for lupoli? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 16:53:10
      - You were quiet for 82 minutes (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 13, 16:54:55
        
        lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 16:56:20
        
        well i predicted 2-0 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 16:56:05
        
        Fuk You and Pants Deserve Each Other (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 13, 16:57:50
        
        Harsh on SCC imo (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Dec 13, 17:00:58
        
        agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 13, 16:58:21
        
        lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Trousers, Dec 13, 16:59:31

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.