Most assuredly WW2, but I've only just seen this

Roeder re the 2nd half of the Palace game:

"In that withdrawn role behind Lita, Wes again had a real impact on the game," admitted the City chief. "And, again, should have proved to everyone that when you play one up through the middle and basically play 4-3-3 it is just as attack-minded as 4-4-2. And we were camped in their half for virtually the whole of the second-half."

If he really believes that that formation is as attacking as 4-4-2, why the f*ck did he drop Wes, rather than start with it?

(Sorry if this has been done to death - haven't been around....)

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on November 28th 2008 at 13:47:25

Message Thread

Most assuredly WW2, but I've only just seen this (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 28, 13:47:25
- The trouble is (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 28, 14:13:09
  - anyone would think we were going through a transition period, and (NCFC) - pants, Nov 28, 14:14:46
    - I know you love to think that you are the only person to have noticed this (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 28, 14:16:26
      - I know you like to think you know what I think (NCFC) - pants, Nov 28, 14:23:33
      - and also.... (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 28, 14:19:23
        
        If the answer to your question was that simple (NCFC) - pants, Nov 28, 14:22:48
        
        what question? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 28, 14:24:09
        
        yours (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Nov 28, 14:28:57
- Been mentioned, but not that quote, and not done-to-death. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 28, 13:50:41
  - He has to start the next game with Hooly-in-the-hole doesn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 28, 13:54:27
    - Wel, *I* think so, yes. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 28, 13:56:40
      - No, cos the next game is away (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 28, 14:15:39
        
        Dint he say he took Sib off on Toosdee with one eye on Satdee though? (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 28, 14:20:19
        
        Even Roeder isn't that stubborn (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 28, 14:22:22
        
        I hope you're right. For two reasons now. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 28, 14:25:17
        
        ha ha (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 28, 14:26:08
        
        How do we know that Naked Posting isn't your usual Saturday night modus operandi? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 28, 14:35:20
        
        I promise it isn't, although I do agree I might find I like it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 28, 14:39:35
        
        And how will we know if you will honour your promise if you lose? (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 28, 14:44:12
        
        Who is notoriously reliable? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 28, 14:44:55
        
        certainly not Matthew Gibson (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Nov 28, 14:46:38
        
        Definitely not The Gib. Who I notice has gone missing again. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 28, 14:48:39
        
        Well, I've always paid up my Wrath Bets. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 28, 14:46:09
        
        Me too (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 28, 14:49:49
      - I fear the same. Would be wrong but I'm expecting it. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 28, 14:06:16
- I think you know the answer to that (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 28, 13:49:44
  - I don't think I really do? But suspect it's a mixture of (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 28, 13:54:21
- maybe he just found out it works, from that game? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Nov 28, 13:48:39

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.