That can't be right, can it?
If you assume a ?10 bet on City losing every time, surely the winnings from the 50% correct bets would be well ahead of the loss of the 50% losing stakes?
Unless the odds were incredibly ungenerous
Damn, I may have to take SCC off ignore again to find out what he says, he's rather good at this sort of thing
Posted By: Old Git on November 21st 2008 at 14:50:12
Message Thread
- I actually think if you used Selwyns predictions, you'd win more than you'd lose (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 21, 14:26:26
- this season you'd have broken even (NCFC) - blindasabat, Nov 21, 14:32:50
- That can't be right, can it? (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 21, 14:50:12
- Considering the odds compilers are remarkably accurate (NCFC) - Charles21, Nov 21, 15:04:56
- well yes, if you want to get technical about it and start introducing odds 'n' stuff... (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Nov 21, 14:58:39
- That can't be right, can it? (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 21, 14:50:12
- You're once (n/m) (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Nov 21, 14:27:02
- this season you'd have broken even (NCFC) - blindasabat, Nov 21, 14:32:50
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.