Roeder's future
I don't subscribe to the view that if you give a bad manager long enough in a job he turns into a good one. That's why managers like Martin O'Neil succeed wherever they manage i.e. because they're a good manager not because they're given long enough. Roeder's problem is that his arrogance led him to state at the start of the season that his crop of players, albeit most of them loans, were much stronger than last season and therefore he's failing miserably. If this is the case then it's not a question of 'can we afford to sack him' it's 'can we afford not to'. It also leaves a huge question mark over the ability of the Board to be capable of selecting the right man for the job and their record is little short of pathetic. Not only that, but once they've made their poor decision they seem to give the manager carte blanche to do as he sees fit without any questions being asked. Therefore we employ shoddy manager after shoddy manager each lurching off in their own direction and the nett effect is continual failure.
Posted By: Chopper on November 16th 2008 at 13:24:04
Message Thread
- Roeder's future (NCFC) - Chopper, Nov 16, 13:24:04
- you missed one point - O'Neil was/is great because he knew when to leave (n/m) (NCFC) - 1902, Nov 16, 13:53:38
- Did we ever think he would do better than in the past? (NCFC) - John in Texas, Nov 16, 13:43:56
- Hope ssprings eternal, at least till the first defeat of the season (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Nov 16, 14:00:13
- i'd like to think we did (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 16, 13:50:03
- Surely you know full well, O'Neill picks his jobs, not the ones of struggling teams (NCFC) - pants, Nov 16, 13:30:26
- disagree with you ona few things, but you are spot on here. (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 16, 13:44:39
- If in the summer Roeder resigned, and said he felt without full backing (NCFC) - pants, Nov 16, 13:32:37
- he's the enemy cos we're crap (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 16, 13:33:28
- But, according to some below who went yesdy, we're not crap - (NCFC) - CB41, Nov 16, 13:35:59
- Not winning = crap (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 16, 13:37:56
- Oh (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Nov 16, 13:42:12
- 8 wins from 31 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 16, 13:41:15
- I know, Saturday nights have been shit for ages . (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 16, 13:42:39
- I blame "Casualty" and all those feckin dance progs myself (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Nov 16, 13:44:05
- Lol !!! bring back... (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 16, 13:47:09
- Nah, Black n White Minstrels and Waggon Train (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Nov 16, 13:56:04
- Or "move 'em on, head 'em up... RAWHIDE " (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 16, 14:00:33
- Rawhide was brillos. (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Nov 16, 14:05:19
- Or "move 'em on, head 'em up... RAWHIDE " (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 16, 14:00:33
- Nah, Black n White Minstrels and Waggon Train (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Nov 16, 13:56:04
- Lol !!! bring back... (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 16, 13:47:09
- I blame "Casualty" and all those feckin dance progs myself (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Nov 16, 13:44:05
- I know, Saturday nights have been shit for ages . (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 16, 13:42:39
- Not winning = crap (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 16, 13:37:56
- But, according to some below who went yesdy, we're not crap - (NCFC) - CB41, Nov 16, 13:35:59
- he's the enemy cos we're crap (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 16, 13:33:28
- spot on (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 16, 13:24:43
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.