but
didn't Grant or roeder say that with all the fees you have to pay out with loan players you might as well buy them? Didn't someon once ask for a signing on fee of nearly 1 million or another crazy amount?
Either way at the end of the loan they are fit so Portsmouth, Spurs etc.... win
The player has put himself in the shop window for someone to actually take a chance on them, so he wins.
Norwich end up with no assessts, no players, less transfer money, the players don't know each other so they don't connect
we get screwed when you get so many. 3 is fine maybe 4 but EIGHT/NINE is pointless!
Posted By: bullsch on November 1st 2008 at 21:01:58
Message Thread
- Why has Roeder brought in so many loan players? (NCFC) - bullsch, Nov 1, 20:52:56
- well (NCFC) - forrest, Nov 1, 20:58:40
- because an average player costs ?1m he was hoping t get lucky I guess , the club works to (NCFC) - lovely old job, Nov 1, 20:55:51
- but (NCFC) - bullsch, Nov 1, 21:01:58
- I agree - I am not trying to back it up - the fact is Lita would not be here if it wasn't (NCFC) - lovely old job, Nov 1, 21:06:39
- bollocks does he (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 20:58:27
- 9 (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Nov 1, 21:00:55
- but (NCFC) - bullsch, Nov 1, 21:01:58
- Yeah whereas permanent signings (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Nov 1, 20:54:59
- previous bad players from other regimes (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 20:56:36
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.