nah it was nothing to do with laying us
and anyway you can only lay on exchanges which these aren't, and the movement meant the money was on us to win, or not lose.
not 100% with asian betting, but i guess you're right that the bets would have just got their money back as it was based on the 2nd half result. had marshall not made the error, then the bets would have been landed. so in fact, contrary to what i first thought, it only took 1 goal for the bet to win, making it more plausible for carroll to want to get sent off as didn't need to concede another, and if the pen was converted was just relying on derby not scoring. allegedly.
Posted By: SCC 28 on October 17th 2008 at 04:33:57
Message Thread
- OK - question for others when they wake up (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Oct 17, 04:15:59
- nah it was nothing to do with laying us (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 17, 04:33:57
- tho asian handicaps can be on bigger margins (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 17, 04:41:13
- plus i didn't realise carroll managed to kick lita in the head (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 17, 04:52:43
- tho asian handicaps can be on bigger margins (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 17, 04:41:13
- nah it was nothing to do with laying us (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 17, 04:33:57
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.