One sided attack
When is Roeder going to stop just attacking down 1 side of the pitch?
It seems that the opposition always suss us out and we never have a plan B
It's the same as when we had Hucks on the left. All the opposition had to do was stop Hucks and they stopped Norwich. Now it's just the same but on the other side.
I know for a fact that Bertrand isn't happy being played out of position at LM and would be far happier playing at left back, so just for once why can't Roeder play his players in their favoured positions and hopefully add some much needed balance to the side.
I can understand being tight on one side of the pitch if the opposition has a tricky winger or playmaker who's creativity you want to cut out, but surely away at the likes of Barnsley and Southampton you should be trying to press forwards and impose yourself on the game.
It seems to me that Roeder is more content on relying on the opposition making mistakes and us capatilising on them rather than us actually trying to take the game to anyone.
I just wish that for once he'd show some balls and attack for a change
Posted By: sadlerman on September 30th 2008 at 22:50:05
Message Thread
- One sided attack (NCFC) - sadlerman, Sep 30, 22:50:05
- we used to play 2 attacking wingers (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 30, 22:56:14
- This board's got lots of attacking whingers (n/m) (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Sep 30, 22:57:33
- we used to play 2 attacking wingers (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 30, 22:56:14
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.