no, because he could have said so beforehand
we had enough updates on Jarret and Safri's fitness yet there was no mention of Shackell's (and he played a week ago against Inter and by all accounts looked just fine). Looks like a PR response to criticism from fans/press by the club and frankly I'm taking it with a pinch of salt. Their only concern is to make themselves look good (thier job, of course, but it means their public pronouncements - "I want to replace every player who leaves" - frankly aren't to be trusted)
Posted By: mr carra on August 8th 2005 at 13:28:31
Message Thread
- Shacks explanation (NCFC) - HarryHelveg, Aug 8, 12:57:04
- i thank you (NCFC) - Canaria_glorificus, Aug 8, 13:32:55
- Thankyou! (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Aug 8, 13:05:40
- Anyone want to apologise to Worthington? (NCFC) - Clare, Aug 8, 13:05:23
- no, because he could have said so beforehand (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 8, 13:28:31
- Wanker that bloke (n/m) (NCFC) - Brennan not Hucks, Aug 8, 13:30:24
- no, because he could have said so beforehand (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 8, 13:28:31
- Let's hop that is the real reason... (NCFC) - Delveg, Aug 8, 13:05:20
- That was hope obviously, it wasn't... (NCFC) - Delveg, Aug 8, 13:06:29
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.