Er, i thought the FA could not downgrade it to a yellow?
Therefore, by winning the appeal, isn't that then saying the incident wasn't worth a yellow?
Cause it quite clearly was.
Personally, I think its a red.
For me that's more than your usual pull back, its so so obvious.
I don't like this whole "taking one for the team bollocks"
THat kind of cynical foul with no attempt what so ever to do anything but foul him should be a red.
Although its clearly not serious foul play, would need a new rule or definition.
Posted By: megson on September 16th 2008 at 15:15:14
Message Thread
- surprise surprise (Other Football) - south, Sep 16, 15:08:36
- Er, i thought the FA could not downgrade it to a yellow? (Other Football) - megson, Sep 16, 15:15:14
- but had the appeal been by Plymouth (Other Football) - south, Sep 16, 15:18:29
- Thought it was a second yellow the Plymouth chappy got ? (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Sep 16, 15:19:43
- but just suppose that it had been a straight red (Other Football) - south, Sep 16, 15:21:36
- Thought it was a second yellow the Plymouth chappy got ? (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Sep 16, 15:19:43
- he thought whatsisface was thru on goal. Was a correct red card. (n/m) (Other Football) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 16, 15:16:13
- Should have been a yellow (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Sep 16, 15:16:13
- meh maybe. Point is FA statement said they could not downgrade (Other Football) - megson, Sep 16, 15:27:04
- but had the appeal been by Plymouth (Other Football) - south, Sep 16, 15:18:29
- Correct decision. Shame though! (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Sep 16, 15:10:01
- Er, i thought the FA could not downgrade it to a yellow? (Other Football) - megson, Sep 16, 15:15:14
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.