Yeah, I've had whinges about them live. Knebworth were good though.

As was one of the Wembley gigs.

Although that could have been more down to the vastness of alcohol and singing on the Ball City at wembley and other assorted stupidness than Oasis themselves.

Posted By: megson on September 5th 2008 at 14:58:24

Message Thread

WTF ? Have a word Sky News, Oasis aren't bloody indie... (n/m) (General Chat) - Arganth, Sep 5, 14:43:20
- Technically (General Chat) - BluWit, Sep 5, 15:19:07
- Hasn't really been a time accross their career where I've (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 14:44:46
  - First album - brilliant. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Sep 5, 14:46:39
    - 1993, Shaker Maker (General Chat) - APB, Sep 5, 14:49:00
      - Always Preferred Blur (n/m) (General Chat) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Sep 5, 15:20:26
        
        Mockney benders intut (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 5, 15:29:38
    - SEcond album was pretty good too; but not as good as the first (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Sep 5, 14:47:46
    - I preferred the second album, but certainly shit since then (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 5, 14:47:21
      - ...and utterly boring live (saw them in Den Bosch in 97) (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 5, 14:47:34
        
        Yeah, I've had whinges about them live. Knebworth were good though. (General Chat) - megson, Sep 5, 14:58:24
        
        Really? I thought Knebworth was shit (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Sep 5, 15:09:32
        
        I was pretty youngish, like er 18 or so I think. (General Chat) - megson, Sep 5, 15:32:09
        
        Yeah, I was dragged to Knebworth (General Chat) - yarmyyarmy, Sep 5, 15:12:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.