Same as with one of the new signings when we were told it was funded entirely by the board - Wrath of the Barclay

Same as with one of the new signings when we were told it was funded entirely by the board

Why do they need to put that in? Its just point proving that we dont need PC in their eyes

Posted By: Klobo04 on September 2nd 2008 at 12:21:52

Message Thread

Shortest statement in history now on official site (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Sep 2, 12:11:03
- ..... (NCFC) - Klobo04, Sep 2, 12:12:32
  - no need to specify the 'interest free loans of 2.5m' bit (NCFC) - Dave in France, Sep 2, 12:17:04
    - Same as with one of the new signings when we were told it was funded entirely by the board (NCFC) - Klobo04, Sep 2, 12:21:52
      - Which it turns out have been funded by the sale of Shackell (n/m) (NCFC) - Ben, Sep 2, 12:24:48
    - have they got their ?2.5M back - thats the question? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Sep 2, 12:21:09
  - well that's all that nicely cleared up then (NCFC) - blindasabat, Sep 2, 12:15:50
    - Gotta say (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Sep 2, 12:24:34
      - "we don't own the club" - well i own a little bit of it (NCFC) - blindasabat, Sep 2, 12:28:48
    - makes it even more weird that they didn't try harder with Cullum! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Sep 2, 12:20:24

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.