plus players who are on the ncfc payroll and never even see the bench
if we're going down the "loanees on the bench" route, we should get rid of the reserves.
Posted By: Dave in France on September 1st 2008 at 23:21:37
Message Thread
- Haha, so after all that whinging, we've signed 2 players today (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 1, 23:13:40
- well actually we're one player less after today (n/m) (NCFC) - Ben, Sep 1, 23:23:44
- yes - in real terms. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Sep 1, 23:24:16
- No - in real terms (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Sep 1, 23:46:36
- yes - in real terms. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Sep 1, 23:24:16
- I really don't understand the Grounds signing and that's 8 loans now - why (NCFC) - lovely old job, Sep 1, 23:18:22
- plus players who are on the ncfc payroll and never even see the bench (NCFC) - Dave in France, Sep 1, 23:21:37
- Yes but permanently (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Sep 1, 23:17:13
- Yes, until January (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 1, 23:16:20
- by which time we will have sewn up mid table mediocrity (NCFC) - Tomblander, Sep 1, 23:19:57
- well actually we're one player less after today (n/m) (NCFC) - Ben, Sep 1, 23:23:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.