i hate loans

incidently i HATE loans.
1. the player doesnt seem like ours,
2. he seems not 100% committed to club (or just "trying to get fit"),
3. they are expensive,
4. we cant make a profit from them on resale
5. and it pushes our young talent down the order, so they dont play enough games and go to seed at 21 because they have only played 5 games.
6. we also dont seem to have our own whole team
meanwhile the loanee team gets a better player back and cash.
i except that sometimes they are necessary, ie last season or with view to permanate transfer
whats the point of 7 loan players? i would rather we took a chance on div 1/2 players who are hungry and committed.

am i just a twisted old moaner who doesnt have a grasp on reality?

Posted By: conkers on September 1st 2008 at 20:27:13

Message Thread

i hate loans (NCFC) - conkers, Sep 1, 20:27:13
- hucks was a loan (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Sep 1, 20:30:11
  - i agree but (NCFC) - conkers, Sep 1, 20:33:19
    - 1 or 2 but 7 is taking the piss (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Sep 1, 20:37:56
    - Yep. At least when permanent signings turn out to be good and leave (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 1, 20:34:58
  - loans with a view to perm signing are different (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 1, 20:32:10
    - Wonder how much he cost us all in? (NCFC) - Tim Westwood, Sep 1, 20:33:35
      - i agree no. 2 (NCFC) - conkers, Sep 1, 20:38:40
- Sadly it looks like that is the only way to bring in quality (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Sep 1, 20:30:04
  - You know why that is :-) (n/m) (NCFC) - Tim Westwood, Sep 1, 20:30:46

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.