happy with that.

doc was ok in preseason and needs to be given a chance at this level. Shacks was ill in the summer and is probably still recovering. it takes months to totally get over that sort of thing. Both players need to play alongside flem to learn from an experienced defender. So shacks and doc take it in turns.

Posted By: Dave in France on August 6th 2005 at 09:53:38

Message Thread

No Shackell today then (NCFC) - The Editor of Milk, Aug 6, 09:08:51
- A dozen good reasons not to pick Shackell (NCFC) - Cannydc, Aug 6, 09:50:16
  - and yet he's still better than Flem (n/m) (NCFC) - Butterworth, Aug 6, 12:08:51
  - with all those problems we should transfer list him (NCFC) - Dave in France, Aug 6, 09:51:52
    - They all have perms (NCFC) - Cannydc, Aug 6, 09:53:24
- You know what is a fucking disgrace... (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Aug 6, 09:17:24
  - Ha ha.. he's a one. I'm doing me own fry up today (n/m) (NCFC) - The Editor of Milk, Aug 6, 09:26:03
- i know if he doesnt start worthy has gone mad. shacks is better than doherty (n/m) (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Aug 6, 09:13:17
- is that confirmed? (n/m) (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Aug 6, 09:10:55
  - All comments in the press point to a Doc/Flem combo (n/m) (NCFC) - DDiM, Aug 6, 09:12:36
    - happy with that. (NCFC) - Dave in France, Aug 6, 09:53:38

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.