I wouldn't be opposed to us signing him provided....
he was signed on a 1 year deal in ADDITION to a tall striker on a permanent (Iversen) and he didn't want big wages.
I would rather we signed him on a 1 year deal than another Premiership teenager on a season long loan. Plus i don't JFH would miss the sitters that JC et all have missed this and last season.
He would add valuable experience and muscle to what i feel is a relatively young and inexperienced side. Iversen would do the same.
Posted By: The Duke of Norfolk on August 17th 2008 at 22:13:19
Message Thread
- So we getting Jimmy then ? (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Aug 17, 22:08:27
- I wouldn't be opposed to us signing him provided.... (NCFC) - The Duke of Norfolk, Aug 17, 22:13:19
- I don't mind him as a goalscorer, greedy strop merchant though (NCFC) - pants, Aug 17, 22:21:41
- I think your'e right.. there must be something in it surely ? (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Aug 17, 22:14:35
- no, err yes, err maybe, err dunno???? (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Aug 17, 22:09:53
- Ok I understand.,. (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Aug 17, 22:12:14
- I wouldn't be opposed to us signing him provided.... (NCFC) - The Duke of Norfolk, Aug 17, 22:13:19
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.