Yes...but there is s**t and entertaining s**t
Posted By: Buckscanary on August 13th 2008 at 21:33:10
Message Thread
- and as for all this: would we have been better with Hucks etc etc (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 13, 21:26:39
- Yes...but there is shit and entertaining shit (n/m) (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Aug 13, 21:33:10
- cough-without him last year aor year before we would be league 1 by now (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 13, 21:28:27
- Really?!?!? (NCFC) - NezB, Aug 13, 22:43:15
- maybe, but who cares about what impact he'd have now? not me (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 13, 21:29:24
- well you should care because it was THE MANAGER who made the decision (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 13, 21:32:20
- and hes still in charge (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 13, 21:32:49
- no, you're wrong. Huck has gone, so what point arguing the toss over (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 13, 21:34:34
- because the bloke who got rid is still in charge! of cos its relevent (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 13, 21:36:35
- yeah and largely beause of that bloke we didn't get relegated after grunt fucked up (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 13, 21:37:43
- jury still out then! (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 13, 21:39:53
- yeah and largely beause of that bloke we didn't get relegated after grunt fucked up (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 13, 21:37:43
- because the bloke who got rid is still in charge! of cos its relevent (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 13, 21:36:35
- no, you're wrong. Huck has gone, so what point arguing the toss over (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 13, 21:34:34
- and hes still in charge (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 13, 21:32:49
- well you should care because it was THE MANAGER who made the decision (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 13, 21:32:20
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.