Bit harsh to drop Croft after his pre-season? - Wrath of the Barclay

Bit harsh to drop Croft after his pre-season?

but otherwise makes sense. I quite like the idea of wingbacks, given the defenders we have.

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on August 7th 2008 at 10:34:17

Message Thread

So today is presumably the last day anyone could realistically sign and play on Sat'dee (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 7, 10:26:19
- this ............ (NCFC) - lmc, Aug 7, 10:34:22
  - no OJ ? (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Aug 7, 10:53:39
    - He's a murderer! (n/m) (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Aug 7, 11:13:44
- No, all posts are placed correctly as far as I can see (n/m) (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Aug 7, 10:31:26
  - heh heh heh. good 'un (n/m) (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Aug 7, 10:33:49
- With what we have I'd line up (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Aug 7, 10:30:04
  - Bit harsh to drop Croft after his pre-season? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 7, 10:34:17
    - Dunno (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Aug 7, 10:35:36
  - 5-3-1-1? (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Aug 7, 10:31:51
    - 3-5-1-1 isn't it? (n/m) (NCFC) - trueyellow, Aug 7, 10:34:23
    - 3-5-1-1 (n/m) (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Aug 7, 10:34:20
- I'd get all 11 of them to line up on the edge of the centre circle and charge at goal, (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Aug 7, 10:29:20
  - 6 pack formation... (NCFC) - moomoo, Aug 7, 10:33:39

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.