With reference to the email below
Doesn't prove the chap, who is a respected poster, didn't change what was written.
The email has the correct confidentiality statement for Towergate emails:
******************************************************************************************************************************************This email is from Towergate Partnership Limited or one of its Subsidiary Companies. Its contents are confidential to the intended recipient(s) at the email address(es) to which it has been addressed. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than the addressee(s), nor may it be copied in anyway. If received in error, please contact the sender, then delete it from your system. Although this email and attachments are believed to be free of virus, or any other defect which might affect any computer or IT system into which they are received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Towergate for any loss or damage arising in any way from receipt or use thereof. The following companies are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority: Towergate Underwriting Group Ltd, Towergate London Market Ltd, Folgate Insurance Company Ltd, Fusion Insurance Services Ltd and GHBC Limited. *******************************************************************************************************************************************
I also checked the headers included is this in References:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jul 2008 10:11:50.0057 (UTC) FILETIME=[3253E990:01C8E663]
X-P3Scan: Version 2.2.1 by /
Return-Path: phrankin@hotmail.com
--_11f313e4-7c8d-45f4-9470-2b2572b1bebb_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
--_11f313e4-7c8d-45f4-9470-2b2572b1bebb_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
--_11f313e4-7c8d-45f4-9470-2b2572b1bebb_--
Posted By: phrankin on July 15th 2008 at 11:43:48
Message Thread
- With reference to the email below (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 15, 11:43:48
- did you read the fucking text before posting it on here? (NCFC) - Dave in France, Jul 15, 11:56:39
- I havent copied the text. Just linked to Pinkun. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 15, 11:57:43
- and what I put on here is just the Privacy statement (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 15, 11:59:25
- Which is why you should know better (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jul 15, 12:02:22
- Than what? (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 15, 12:05:40
- well stick to posting there then, (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jul 15, 12:12:35
- Than what? (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 15, 12:05:40
- Which is why you should know better (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jul 15, 12:02:22
- and what I put on here is just the Privacy statement (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 15, 11:59:25
- I havent copied the text. Just linked to Pinkun. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 15, 11:57:43
- Does the validity matter? Either way the contents is dull (NCFC) - megson, Jul 15, 11:53:02
- some people were questioning the validity (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 15, 11:55:54
- Ah right, fair enough. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Jul 15, 12:12:02
- that does indicate that he has tried to buy her shares though (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Jul 15, 11:54:28
- so does the fact that he tried to buy her shares last week. (n/m) (NCFC) - cookpassbabtridge, Jul 15, 11:56:18
- some people were questioning the validity (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 15, 11:55:54
- Either post the fucking thing on here, or shut up. For once. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 15, 11:52:45
- Which email? Don't start this again! (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jul 15, 11:51:05
- ooo referencese disappeared! get rid of them brackets (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 15, 11:45:38
- did you read the fucking text before posting it on here? (NCFC) - Dave in France, Jul 15, 11:56:39
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.