42%
of a massively lower figure isn't it? Nearly all of the money originally came in as loans and was then converted to equity.
And the club is almost certainly worth more now.
And what the Times "reckoned" might very well have been wrong.
Posted By: Mr Creosote on July 11th 2008 at 12:58:43
Message Thread
- 42% (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Jul 11, 12:58:43
- and FAO Holden Caulfield (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Jul 11, 13:04:00
- Ah, thank you (n/m) (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Jul 11, 13:06:12
- oi! (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 11, 13:07:13
- I saw his first! (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Jul 11, 13:09:53
- and... (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Jul 11, 13:16:18
- I saw his first! (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Jul 11, 13:09:53
- oi! (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jul 11, 13:07:13
- Ah, thank you (n/m) (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Jul 11, 13:06:12
- and FAO Holden Caulfield (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Jul 11, 13:04:00
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.