Re Doc signing for 2 years
He might be low quality, but at present we only have Shack as an alternative. It'd be mad to have to replace him as well.
Also, if he didn't sign, he was free to walk for nowt. Roeder could well get in sufficient replacements now, in Jan or next summer and we could flog him. Surely he's worth 5-600 grand to someone? Ex premier defender etc etc.
As it stands we have one less player that we urgently have to buy/loan
Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on July 1st 2008 at 15:55:03
Message Thread
- Re Doc signing for 2 years (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jul 1, 15:55:03
- donkerty is the anti-tent (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 1, 16:37:57
- I like that. (n/m) (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Jul 1, 16:46:04
- the funnel? (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jul 1, 16:50:03
- I like that. (n/m) (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Jul 1, 16:46:04
- He is not an alternative at the moment (NCFC) - Claygate_Canary, Jul 1, 15:57:13
- Spillane. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Jul 1, 15:59:31
- I think that Roeder trusts Doc more than Shacks (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jul 1, 16:15:37
- True. (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Jul 1, 16:22:34
- I think that Roeder trusts Doc more than Shacks (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jul 1, 16:15:37
- Spillane. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Jul 1, 15:59:31
- donkerty is the anti-tent (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 1, 16:37:57
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.