Having now read the article, a couple of things...

1. He doesn't actually mention debt - surely the most important thing is to clear the debt? All he mentions is ?20mil for player purchases.

2. "Not going to keep putting more and more money into the club" - so is this it? ?20mil and that's all? Don't we need someone a bit more longer term than that?

3. He wants to put his own people in place "to create an exciting strategy for the club". A bit vague isn't it? I'd want to know more.

Anyone else notice this?

Posted By: LincolnshireCanary on June 30th 2008 at 08:33:35

Message Thread

Having now read the article, a couple of things... (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 30, 08:33:35
- You cannot be serious! (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 30, 09:02:44
  - why is everyone prefacing sums of money with a question mark? (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jun 30, 09:09:13
  - I'm totally serious, and you're answers are full of assumptions (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 30, 09:09:01
    - Sorry did not realise we are in a position to turn our nose up at ?20 million! (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 30, 09:28:07
      - For crying out loud, Jim... (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 30, 09:56:41
- Yes, and also "friendly arm wrestle based on the valuation of the club" (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jun 30, 08:43:11
  - because he says he wants to become majority shareholder (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 30, 08:50:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.