just can't see that at all

doesn't really seem to have improved his game since he first came into the team regularly - can't always be the fault of someone else. Still think we have a love affair with him because he's an academy product.

Posted By: camcan on June 24th 2008 at 11:58:07

Message Thread

another target lost? (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jun 24, 11:23:37
- Hopefully not as I thought he was pretty sh*t and (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 24, 11:50:43
- he has however (NCFC) - Firstnews, Jun 24, 11:28:25
  - d&c? (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jun 24, 11:29:27
    - what does that mean? (n/m) (NCFC) - Firstnews, Jun 24, 11:32:45
      - duckandchips divvy (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jun 24, 11:35:26
      - .... (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 24, 11:35:08
        
        i knew that (NCFC) - Firstnews, Jun 24, 11:38:09
      - it's like c&a, but it's not. (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jun 24, 11:34:11
- No - situation normal there. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Jun 24, 11:25:38
  - Well, situation expected. Was he a target? Probably. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 24, 12:07:24
- That photo makes him look 19 going on 90 (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 24, 11:25:36
  - younger looking than Doc then (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 24, 11:26:30
- Think it was fairly obvious that when Reading were relegated (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 24, 11:25:27
  - doc and shacks it is then (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jun 24, 11:26:58
    - or maybe Martin Arbeitmachtfrei or whatever (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 24, 11:29:34
      - haha (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 24, 11:30:57
    - starts crying (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 24, 11:28:10
      - passes a tissue (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jun 24, 11:29:05
        
        he said crying. I don't think you'll find pants wanking in front of computer ! (n/m) (NCFC) - Snakey, Jun 24, 11:30:02
        
        No, never! (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, Jun 24, 11:35:19
        
        lol (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jun 24, 11:34:49
- I guess, good player (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 24, 11:25:20
  - no better than Doc or Shack....FACT (NCFC) - Rofl_Harris, Jun 24, 11:26:46
    - easilly better than shack (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 24, 11:27:48
      - i disagree (NCFC) - Rofl_Harris, Jun 24, 11:39:27
        
        Shackell clearly better than Doc & probably as good as Pearce imo. Play him in (NCFC) - woody, Jun 24, 11:50:39
        
        just can't see that at all (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 24, 11:58:07
        
        Does anyone else agree with this? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 24, 11:57:03
        
        overrated. Best duo last year was Doc and Taylor imho (n/m) (NCFC) - Snakey, Jun 24, 12:07:20
      - Am I the only one who thought last year that... (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 24, 11:29:39

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.