Coorect

I am talking about the first parachute payment which comes at the end of this season. Don't forget City would probably have budgeted to finish bottom of the Prem so by finishing second from bottom got a 'bonus' ?0.5M. With the ?1M unbudgetted surplus on commercial activity etc I wouldn't be at all surprised if City were able to cover the Ashton fee without actually having to touch any of the parachute payment.

Posted By: scrimmage on August 3rd 2005 at 12:06:16

Message Thread

Worthy's transfer pot (NCFC) - scrimmage, Aug 3, 11:57:05
- correct me if I'm wrong.. (NCFC) - camcan, Aug 3, 11:58:17
  - PLEASE TAKE NOTE - Ashton transfer - how we paid for him (NCFC) - oh arr, Aug 3, 12:29:21
  - that was what Doncaster said at the time (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 3, 12:00:38
    - Scrimmage is talking about... (NCFC) - Delveg, Aug 3, 12:01:39
    - it's just I've noticed a few references on here.. (NCFC) - camcan, Aug 3, 12:01:36
      - We should still have ?3M of this season's left. (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Aug 3, 12:06:16
        
        which is surely partly needed to cover the fact... (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 3, 12:13:06
        
        transfer fees funded by the fans distorted the size of loss in 03/04 season (NCFC) - oh arr, Aug 3, 13:04:24
        
        you have forgotten........ (NCFC) - oh arr, Aug 3, 12:42:17
        
        dont forget the items listed are revenue sources that we didnt have in 04/05 (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Aug 3, 12:47:36
      - Coorect (NCFC) - scrimmage, Aug 3, 12:06:16

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.