what would you call it?

Hucks isn't a midfielder so with him plus two strikers we only have 3 midfielders. Unless you think he's going to play up front with Ashton and no other stiker, allowing us to play 4-4-2. Hucks plus 2 strikers can never equal 4-4-2. That's where last year's defensive woes came from.

Posted By: mr carra on August 3rd 2005 at 11:37:10

Message Thread

Only just seen this: (NCFC) - WOTB No1 Tipster 04, Aug 3, 11:17:36
- One statistic there is a bit worrying though... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Aug 3, 11:20:43
  - rather that than Holts no yellows (n/m) (NCFC) - Wotb Big Boy, Aug 3, 11:21:17
    - Hear! Hear! (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 3, 11:23:15
      - Yeah but let's hope he keeps the bans and red cards to a minimum cos (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Aug 3, 11:24:46
        
        do we need one? (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 3, 11:28:50
        
        Do you honestly think we will play 4-3-3 ? Maybe on Saturday with (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Aug 3, 11:32:55
        
        what would you call it? (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 3, 11:37:10
        
        Dear lord I like the look of that. (n/m) (NCFC) - roywallerslovechild, Aug 3, 11:35:12
        
        Yeah maybe that's the way to go while the CMs are injured ? Although (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Aug 3, 11:37:19
        
        I'd like to see McVeigh involved, but... (NCFC) - Delveg, Aug 3, 11:40:30
        
        Hughes for McVeigh and maybe... (NCFC) - Delveg, Aug 3, 11:34:33
- No. They can't agree on personal ters (and "agent's fees") (n/m) (NCFC) - roywallerslovechild, Aug 3, 11:19:06

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.