There is a difference between what the law is trying to achieve and.....

the strict interpretation.

The ref asks two questions.

1) Did he do so deliberately?
2) Did he seek to gain an advantage in doing so?

Only if both are answered yes will a caution be considered and even then, you'd probably warn them first. It's a bit petty to do so first time up.

Posted By: Johnny Comecardiff on June 10th 2008 at 22:00:08


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in