No
Depends on sizes od semi-circles
Imagine the 4 teams were N, S, E & W
and the ropes got pulled due north, by enough to mean the team at the south had got pulled out of it semi crcle
if the ropes hadn't moved along the E / W axis at all, and if OG's semi-circles were 'wide' enough, then they could still be in.
(Obviously North would have presumably left their semi circle, but in a 'winning' direction. So only South would be eliminated.)
Posted By: Tricky Hawes on May 15th 2008 at 12:11:50
Message Thread
- Breaking gossip on BBC (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, May 15, 11:47:00
- Overated player, wouldn't class him as a inbetweenie (n/m) (NCFC) - Half Pint, May 15, 11:52:11
- roeders fav song (NCFC) - BoundsGreen, May 15, 11:54:37
- a four way tug of war is impossible (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, May 15, 11:47:37
- No it isn't (NCFC) - Old Git, May 15, 11:59:12
- it would be impossible for only one team to be dislodged from the circle (NCFC) - Tomblander, May 15, 12:04:53
- Why? (NCFC) - Old Git, May 15, 12:12:19
- yes but the only way "one" team could be dislodged is if the rope was made of elastic (NCFC) - Tomblander, May 15, 12:16:09
- Simple maths. (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, May 15, 12:15:57
- OK, pen boy, make the "areas" penalty box shaped instead of semi-circles (NCFC) - Old Git, May 15, 12:17:35
- one thing is a cast iron velour clad ocean going certainty (NCFC) - Tomblander, May 15, 12:20:13
- Semi-circles were an error, I admit (NCFC) - Old Git, May 15, 12:23:30
- one thing is a cast iron velour clad ocean going certainty (NCFC) - Tomblander, May 15, 12:20:13
- or all 4 (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, May 15, 12:16:55
- OK, pen boy, make the "areas" penalty box shaped instead of semi-circles (NCFC) - Old Git, May 15, 12:17:35
- No (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 15, 12:11:50
- to clarify (ahem) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 15, 12:13:20
- He's right you know. (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, May 15, 12:10:33
- ^^^^yes^^^^^^ (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 15, 12:16:40
- Disagree. (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, May 15, 12:19:04
- wtf is lateral strength? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 15, 12:19:41
- Strength to hold your position in more than one plane. (n/m) (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, May 15, 12:22:55
- ask morley athletic (NCFC) - BoundsGreen, May 15, 12:22:05
- good spot!! (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, May 15, 12:41:13
- see figure 1 - straight lines, as I said (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 15, 12:25:20
- oh no it fucking does not! (NCFC) - Tomblander, May 15, 12:45:25
- wtf is lateral strength? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 15, 12:19:41
- Disagree. (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, May 15, 12:19:04
- thanking you (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, May 15, 12:14:48
- ^^^^yes^^^^^^ (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 15, 12:16:40
- Why? (NCFC) - Old Git, May 15, 12:12:19
- it would be impossible for only one team to be dislodged from the circle (NCFC) - Tomblander, May 15, 12:04:53
- No it isn't (NCFC) - Old Git, May 15, 11:59:12
- Overated player, wouldn't class him as a inbetweenie (n/m) (NCFC) - Half Pint, May 15, 11:52:11
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.