point a) we might be
Point b) Roeder may not want him
point c) we may be in for someone better/younger
Posted By: megson on May 13th 2008 at 15:29:12
Message Thread
- Why are we not in for him? (NCFC) - WOTB No1 Tipster 04, May 13, 15:26:30
- you think we have 2.5 millkion! we probably did bid (NCFC) - phrankin, May 13, 15:39:57
- "millkion", sounds a bit star trek that. (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, May 13, 15:45:17
- speaking of which (NCFC) - BoundsGreen, May 13, 15:46:54
- "millkion", sounds a bit star trek that. (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, May 13, 15:45:17
- 2.5 seems a bit steep, think we did well to get 3.5. Maybe we're lining up for Ched?! (n/m) (NCFC) - greendude, May 13, 15:29:15
- point a) we might be (NCFC) - megson, May 13, 15:29:12
- Two numbers, a letter, some punctuation and a currency symbol. (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, May 13, 15:28:36
- cos we have NO money (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 13, 15:27:53
- Glad we aren't in for him (NCFC) - pants, May 13, 15:27:26
- We may be - says talks will be after his hols anyway! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, May 13, 15:27:23
- you think we have 2.5 millkion! we probably did bid (NCFC) - phrankin, May 13, 15:39:57
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.