and who were these players we should have signed?
nobody wants to join and we can't score goals and get offered earnie on a plate risk free.
tough decision!
Posted By: SCC 28 on May 8th 2008 at 17:48:27
Message Thread
- So if Earnshaw was the only signing this summer, would you be happy? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 8, 17:40:20
- yeah, the fans could have a raffle to fill the gaps in the team, (bags left wing) (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 8, 18:41:02
- stupid questions deserve stupid answers though (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, May 8, 18:28:00
- I never liked him first time round, although a much better striker than the 1 option we (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, May 8, 18:12:28
- No sane person would be happy. We need at least 6 or 7 to cover most positions. (NCFC) - Snakey, May 8, 18:00:30
- absolutely agree with the first statement. (NCFC) - jAC, May 8, 18:01:41
- he'll never replace hucks (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 8, 18:02:21
- like he's come up with the goods before (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 8, 18:01:14
- Dont believe all that 2nd season shit. The Newcastle board shafted him and he was ill (NCFC) - Snakey, May 8, 18:03:38
- funny though, wanking on about stats, when he had a 46% win ratio (NCFC) - pants, May 8, 18:06:21
- Indeed. Only an idiot in dreamland could justly critisise Roeder at present. (NCFC) - Snakey, May 8, 18:11:07
- 45% in ALL games (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 8, 18:08:35
- funny though, wanking on about stats, when he had a 46% win ratio (NCFC) - pants, May 8, 18:06:21
- Dont believe all that 2nd season shit. The Newcastle board shafted him and he was ill (NCFC) - Snakey, May 8, 18:03:38
- absolutely agree with the first statement. (NCFC) - jAC, May 8, 18:01:41
- We could play him up front with Cureton (NCFC) - lurd, May 8, 17:50:45
- If we could have had a 4-4-2 with Earnie and Iwan as the 2 (NCFC) - Old Git, May 8, 17:52:25
- not to look at (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, May 8, 17:53:24
- If we could have had a 4-4-2 with Earnie and Iwan as the 2 (NCFC) - Old Git, May 8, 17:52:25
- I wouldn't be (NCFC) - Old Git, May 8, 17:47:59
- Of course not (NCFC) - romayellow, May 8, 17:46:57
- sensible answers welcome other than obvious provocation (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 8, 17:44:29
- we had a squad left when we signed him (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 8, 17:43:17
- Squad full of shite though (NCFC) - Old Git, May 8, 17:46:05
- and who were these players we should have signed? (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 8, 17:48:27
- yep (NCFC) - pants, May 8, 17:47:39
- lol at it being a disaster (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 8, 17:50:00
- Squad full of shite though (NCFC) - Old Git, May 8, 17:46:05
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.