On that basis alone, I don't think we should put a bid in.
Posted By: tudders on May 7th 2008 at 12:46:00
Message Thread
- Why weren't we in for Sergio Ramos ? Chelsea apparently just bid 55.3m quid(!) (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, May 7, 12:33:03
- We are the current underbidders (Other Football) - Chutima, May 7, 12:36:18
- Good at being sent off (n/m) (Other Football) - pants, May 7, 12:35:48
- Yes, that must be why they are offering such silly money for him (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, May 7, 12:40:10
- He's a good full back and always worthy of a goal, but the big question is will he ever (Other Football) - pants, May 7, 12:43:55
- On that basis alone, I don't think we should put a bid in. (n/m) (Other Football) - tudders, May 7, 12:46:00
- He is only 22 though. Maybe he will mature a bit. (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, May 7, 12:45:24
- Totally, he isn't talented, but he's never far away from trouble (Other Football) - pants, May 7, 12:47:37
- He'll be fine with the mature influences of Terry, Lampard, Drogba, Ballack et al (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, May 7, 12:49:43
- Totally, he isn't talented, but he's never far away from trouble (Other Football) - pants, May 7, 12:47:37
- He's a good full back and always worthy of a goal, but the big question is will he ever (Other Football) - pants, May 7, 12:43:55
- Yes, that must be why they are offering such silly money for him (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, May 7, 12:40:10
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.