oh indeed but there is no point in saying he's of taken a cut
and to keep saying it till it becomes fact when no one knows if that's true, or how big a cut he would of taken.
We don't know what he's on now, we don't know what GR would of liked to pay to keep him.
If it would of needed anything over a 25 % cut for it to be a resonable footballing decision for GR i highly doubt he'd of taken that.
Fair play to him, why should he when someone will probably match what he currently earns at least?
Posted By: megson on May 6th 2008 at 16:45:45
Message Thread
- Huckerby (again!) (NCFC) - Hcuks, May 6, 16:36:11
- Hucks wasn't offered a new deal to turn down! (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, May 6, 16:39:34
- RE the wages, it could be just that. (NCFC) - megson, May 6, 16:37:54
- According to the club nothing was put in front of him (NCFC) - phrankin, May 6, 16:39:59
- oh indeed but there is no point in saying he's of taken a cut (NCFC) - megson, May 6, 16:45:45
- we also don't know whether it Roeder had definitely made up his mind about him (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 6, 16:52:29
- yeah yeah, seemed pretty obvious to Hucks weeks ago this was going to happen (NCFC) - phrankin, May 6, 16:55:03
- pretty obvious, but not certain? (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 6, 17:16:41
- yeah yeah, seemed pretty obvious to Hucks weeks ago this was going to happen (NCFC) - phrankin, May 6, 16:55:03
- we also don't know whether it Roeder had definitely made up his mind about him (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 6, 16:52:29
- oh indeed but there is no point in saying he's of taken a cut (NCFC) - megson, May 6, 16:45:45
- According to the club nothing was put in front of him (NCFC) - phrankin, May 6, 16:39:59
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.