that's highly debatable

I confess I haven't seen the away games and so can't comment on them, but of the home games he was pretty good against Colchester and Burnley (especially the latter, though arguably not our best player in either game) then back to being merely OK against Baggies and QPR.

That was his best spell of the season and he still didn't look like he was worth being the club's highest wage earner. And he still forces us to play a silly 4-3-3 thing.

He was unbelievable in 2003/4 (as we'll never forget) but since then we have been a poor TEAM and the huge gaps in Hucks' game have often been part of that.

He is a crowd-pleaser, in an age when they are a rarer breed, but he no longer makes us a better team (results this season have generally been better when he hasn't played) and it is for the best that he goes out now (though the manner of it can and will be deabted for ages!)

Posted By: mr carra on May 6th 2008 at 15:25:55

Message Thread

So we sign players like Matt Patterson and we release Hucks....... (NCFC) - Chopper, May 6, 14:43:47
- yes cash...we don't have it, and Huckerby is coming to the end of his career (n/m) (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, May 6, 14:49:20
  - He's been our best player the last 5/6 matches. (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, May 6, 15:00:45
    - that's highly debatable (NCFC) - mr carra, May 6, 15:25:55
    - so roughly 1 in 8 games then...He is too expensive to not play regularly (n/m) (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, May 6, 15:11:42
- HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOF (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 6, 14:44:21
  - Fuck OFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFff (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, May 6, 14:47:40

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.