hardly 'vanished without a trace' though is it? - Wrath of the Barclay

hardly 'vanished without a trace' though is it?

the fact that he got on the pitch ahead of Chadwick should be an indication that he's forced his way back into the manager's thinking...

Posted By: blindasabat on May 6th 2008 at 12:07:43

Message Thread

Little bit sad about Hucks but fully understands... (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, May 6, 11:34:47
- agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 6, 11:41:55
- quite a lot sad cause really didn't see it coming (NCFC) - megson, May 6, 11:37:34
  - gamble? (NCFC) - Tomblander, May 6, 11:40:38
    - as above, so long as its not bottle for the sake of it. (NCFC) - megson, May 6, 11:50:26
      - could *have* obviously. But you all knew that, even Brom, except me. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, May 6, 11:53:15
        
        Getting there. ^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 6, 11:57:50
  - I didn't expect him to actually get culled either. (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, May 6, 11:39:09
    - Not many, but then croft has vanished without a trace now. (NCFC) - megson, May 6, 11:41:10
      - is that the same Croft that came on as a sub for us on Sunday? (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 6, 11:42:44
        
        sigh. And played how many before? (NCFC) - megson, May 6, 11:51:00
        
        hardly 'vanished without a trace' though is it? (NCFC) - blindasabat, May 6, 12:07:43
        
        ok possibly. It just seems strange that he went from being a big part of that run (NCFC) - megson, May 6, 12:12:26
        
        I love Hucks (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, May 6, 11:53:12
        
        Even when Croft is hot (NCFC) - phrankin, May 6, 12:18:08
        
        too true, which is why its probably the right decision (NCFC) - megson, May 6, 11:54:36

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.