Aren't statistics fun?
The problem with your argument is that we kick toward the Barclay first a VAST majority of the time. Thus you could make a similar argument, and still be right, if you said most of our losses came from kicking that way too.
Posted By: NJ_Canary on August 1st 2005 at 13:48:15
Message Thread
- Newboro Canary (NCFC) - Capital Canary, Aug 1, 13:44:17
- Aren't statistics fun? (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Aug 1, 13:48:15
- Yeah, I think I can only remember us... (NCFC) - forumforfootballcom, Aug 1, 13:52:43
- 46% of them are (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 1, 13:50:19
- 67.5% of statistics are made up on the spot (n/m) (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Aug 1, 13:57:03
- 87% if those by 21% of Yanks (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Aug 1, 13:57:41
- Well, I'm responsible for a good percentage, and I ain't a Yank (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Aug 1, 14:00:20
- 87% if those by 21% of Yanks (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Aug 1, 13:57:41
- 67.5% of statistics are made up on the spot (n/m) (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Aug 1, 13:57:03
- Aren't statistics fun? (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Aug 1, 13:48:15
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.