Cureton was crap as usual but i blame Roeder
OK ok you have heard it all before but Cureton was absolutely crap again today.
His fault?
Probably not this time i blame Roeder for playing him there in the first place.
Lost 2 1 could have been 6...........
My ratins for what it`s worth.
Marshall 8
Otsemebor 5
Pearce 7
Docherty 8
Betrand 6
Russel 5
Pattison 5
Huckerby 6
Dublin 5
Evans 9
Cureton 4 (I am assuming this to be the lowest mark we can give. Perhaps the responsibility of the arm-band was weighing him down )
Can we go down?
On this performance yes we can.
Posted By: Tilly on April 13th 2008 at 16:10:44
Message Thread
- Cureton (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Apr 13, 14:47:49
- Cureton was crap as usual but i blame Roeder (NCFC) - Tilly, Apr 13, 16:10:44
- I'm no expert, but... (NCFC) - The Judge, Apr 13, 16:21:38
- you're right, you are certainly no expert. (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of pork, Apr 13, 16:27:14
- It doesn't matter how much you try and grab my attention (NCFC) - The Judge, Apr 13, 16:29:22
- you're right, you are certainly no expert. (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of pork, Apr 13, 16:27:14
- bertrand 6! lol- 3 more like and marshall 5-his kicking is shit. all the rest 4-5 at best (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Apr 13, 16:18:08
- But how many saves did Marshall make (NCFC) - Tilly, Apr 13, 16:28:45
- I'm no expert, but... (NCFC) - The Judge, Apr 13, 16:21:38
- Cureton was crap as usual but i blame Roeder (NCFC) - Tilly, Apr 13, 16:10:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.