Sure they were not stools in that case? - Wrath of the Barclay

Sure they were not stools in that case?

Posted By: Andyjzr on March 29th 2008 at 19:32:20

Message Thread

Just back (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Mar 29, 18:50:59
- That's what Waggers and Goreham both said, I would have been happy with a point (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Mar 29, 18:52:58
  - Both Hucks & Dion should have scored in first half (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Mar 29, 19:08:08
    - Sure they were not stools in that case? (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Mar 29, 19:32:20
      - As in turds? (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Mar 29, 19:35:46
        
        Stool = ref. (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Mar 29, 19:41:57
        
        I didn't think he was bad today! (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Mar 29, 19:45:12
        
        Have you heard GR yet :) ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Mar 29, 19:45:59
  - think how colchester feel (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 18:57:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.