where daley wasn't involved

so when you said "the fact that Daley made the bench instead of Henry rather disproves the theory that Roeder had an obligation to play the premiership kids", you were talking a lot of old guff.

More generally, agree with you that Henry appears not to have been good enough. But that's vindication of DoY's criticism of us getting a load of prem youngsters in on loan, surely? ie more evidence Duke was right, and you (whoever you are, but presumably you disagreed with him) were wrong. (Don't suppose having Henry was free, either.)

Which regular are you, hiding behind the name, anyway?

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on March 18th 2008 at 13:11:11


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in