He played well and set up some good attacks

Huckerby got the ball most times, had an idea what to do with it, but realised he wasn't as fast as he used to be. From there he'd either lose the ball because someone would be faster in game and tackle him, or he'd just get tackled from trying to take them on

It was a sorry sight Charles and sorry if you think it's a wind up. I've said Gibbs was the player of the first half and faded second, I haven't just licked his arse for the benefit of being controversial on here

And every other person at the match hey, do you have proof of that?

Posted By: pants on March 16th 2008 at 16:27:23

Message Thread

General thoughts yesterday, although not majorly at fault, Marshall's confidence is shot. (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 16:00:42
- Just re read this, was a bit harsh only a small mention, but fozzy is bloody great (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 22:51:47
  - rofl (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 23:08:52
    - more trolling (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 23:51:20
- How surprising (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 16, 16:23:12
  - I actually praised Gibbs actually... (NCFC) - greencanary, Mar 16, 16:29:04
    - did you actually? (n/m) (NCFC) - Dave in France, Mar 16, 17:04:19
      - his/her name is greencanary. who is this actually person? (n/m) (NCFC) - WalterTheSofty, Mar 16, 17:17:05
      - actually he did actually (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 17:09:13
  - He played well and set up some good attacks (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 16:27:23
    - Sorry, every other person at the match (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 16, 16:30:14
      - great shout (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 16:34:41
      - great shout (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 16:34:03
        
        I thought it was a common trait of part time fans not to know who players are (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 16:35:26
      - So you truely believe that when on mass people say the same thing (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 16:33:31
        
        No I don't (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 16, 16:38:26
        
        I gave an opinion on what I saw yesterday, jesus fucking christ (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 16:40:32
        
        There you are, it's what you and scc wanted, a blub (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 16:42:03
        
        Made my day! (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Mar 16, 18:05:05
        
        Says more about you than it does about anything (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 22:52:33
        
        I'm not doing anything for a rise (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 16, 16:53:06
        
        sorry I wasn't around for you bellends to cream your pants with excitement (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 20:19:22
        
        bellends? (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 16, 22:56:02
        
        lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 23:09:30
        
        I can actually, you just decided to throw whatever my opinion was out of the window (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 23:04:52
        
        and no offence, but (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 23:09:25
        
        I certainly was not looking for a laugh with SCC (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 16, 23:42:06
        
        Sorry, I don't believe you (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 23:49:55
        
        No probs (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 16, 23:56:09
        
        haha quality blubbing (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 23:11:49
        
        See Charles? (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 23:13:22
        
        eg, he wasn't online when I logged in, yet he's suddenly here (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 23:14:29
        
        i've very much been online tyvm (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 23:18:01
        
        lol, the paranoia wind up, coming someone who changes their view on what seems a minute by (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 23:23:17
        
        i had a few lump on job winners (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 20:29:14
        
        he's not worth it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 16:54:04
        
        Clearly am (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 20:28:09
        
        goodnight (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 20:29:34
        
        we both expected better tbh (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 16:47:20
        
        You've missed most of the first half (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Mar 16, 16:42:41
        
        lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 16:45:59
        
        the problem is (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 16:41:41
        
        which is why he gets in so many rucks (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 16:39:41
        
        Great post (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Mar 16, 18:22:03
        
        lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 16, 16:41:57
        
        the correct term is en masse (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 16, 16:35:27
    - Here's 2 (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 16:28:18
- rofl (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 16:15:30
- Oh, and set pieces and long balls with a generally short team isn't exactly (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 16:08:22
  - Lastly, without a strong referee, we'd have had more red cards (NCFC) - pants, Mar 16, 16:09:44

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.