To protect Ben yes,
but in reality when you know a landlord who's had the monthly update of banned persons from the old bill that makes it FACT (and not in a WOTB way).
Posted By: megson on March 14th 2008 at 16:17:17
Message Thread
- Sorry - an NCFC-related post... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Mar 14, 16:01:17
- in summary, stop fighting outside pubs in beccles (NCFC) - megson, Mar 14, 16:06:06
- does that mean... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Mar 14, 16:16:49
- Outside anywhere but a pub, (NCFC) - megson, Mar 14, 16:18:15
- martin or spillane? (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 14, 16:30:36
- not too hard to guess is it? (NCFC) - megson, Mar 14, 16:36:54
- martin or spillane? (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 14, 16:30:36
- Outside anywhere but a pub, (NCFC) - megson, Mar 14, 16:18:15
- Allegedly (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Mar 14, 16:07:49
- To protect Ben yes, (NCFC) - megson, Mar 14, 16:17:17
- I do believe that said person is now the proud owner of an ASBO (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Mar 14, 16:27:13
- why sir, I belive you may be correct! Badge of honour innit. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Mar 14, 16:35:21
- I do believe that said person is now the proud owner of an ASBO (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Mar 14, 16:27:13
- To protect Ben yes, (NCFC) - megson, Mar 14, 16:17:17
- does that mean... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Mar 14, 16:16:49
- in summary, stop fighting outside pubs in beccles (NCFC) - megson, Mar 14, 16:06:06
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.