except when grant refused to guarantee fergie that shawcross would play

He was criticised for it as we lost out on a good player.
Either way someone would moan.
I don't see this issue though, fans need to realise there will always be amangers willing to give that promise, so if we don't do it we'll lose out.
Why would a manager let a player go to sit on a championship bench? they'd do just as well staying at theit parent club.
These managers will always want to see their players playing for the team they are loaned to.

Posted By: megson on March 12th 2008 at 16:54:03

Message Thread

Roeder's degree of responsibility for our recent run (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Mar 12, 15:33:10
- except when grant refused to guarantee fergie that shawcross would play (NCFC) - megson, Mar 12, 16:54:03
  - great example (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 12, 17:17:19
- but he's fucked up team selections chronic (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 12, 15:43:12
- finally a norwich thread this afternoon (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 12, 15:42:05
- He's also responsible for 38 points out of 25 games (NCFC) - pants, Mar 12, 15:40:36
- "but it IS his fault if team spirit and cohesion has been undermined as a result." (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Mar 12, 15:39:01
  - They always say that. (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 12, 15:44:37
    - They don't always say that - both Croft and Hucks have mentioned low morale in previous (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Mar 12, 15:46:14
      - tis true, I take it back - and anything Murray says (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 12, 15:48:05
- if that's in a nutshell (NCFC) - Dave in France, Mar 12, 15:37:36
  - haha (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Mar 12, 15:49:07

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.