NO - Roeder has said they are no for sale, and it could upset players that will be here...

next season, that's what worries me, bad planning what are they for? It wasn't like we were doing badly before they came?

Posted By: greendude on February 16th 2008 at 17:27:10

Message Thread

Seriously, is Hucks the first Roeder proper Fuck up? (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Feb 16, 17:21:03
- Yes, not just Hucks the whole 2nd bunch of loans decision is dubious (n/m) (NCFC) - greendude, Feb 16, 17:23:26
  - if they improve, we might sign some, if they don't, we've got pre season to look for (NCFC) - pants, Feb 16, 17:24:17
    - think roeder is getting it exactly right (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 16, 17:27:14
    - NO - Roeder has said they are no for sale, and it could upset players that will be here... (NCFC) - greendude, Feb 16, 17:27:10
    - Henry and Pearce (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 16, 17:26:24
- Huckerby's relationship with managers isn't the best though (NCFC) - pants, Feb 16, 17:22:48
  - I think it's more to do with his agent's comments to be honest (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 16, 17:26:04
    - Oooooo get you being all aloof about your opinions!! (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 16, 17:28:36
      - Well, don't want to bang on and on and on (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 16, 17:29:34
  - hes got away with it-up until now i feel (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 16, 17:24:02
- its not as if he is building for next season by playing crofty left wing (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 17:22:15
  - 5 loanees going back you mean (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 16, 17:23:12
    - expect 5 to replace them next year (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 16, 17:24:29
    - hopefully we can keep Camara (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 17:23:38
- yes (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 16, 17:21:35

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.