so play 2 right wingers instead?
Posted By: phrankin on February 16th 2008 at 15:40:51
Message Thread
- Win or loose, Roeder was wrong not to include Hucks... (NCFC) - greendude, Feb 16, 15:30:41
- ... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 16, 15:36:16
- No he should be in the 16 whatever. He can play up front, on the wing he's dangerous (n/m) (NCFC) - greendude, Feb 16, 15:42:21
- probably, yes (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 16, 15:48:42
- so play 2 right wingers instead? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 15:40:51
- Can't have two wingers in the same team. Don't ask me why, I'm not a manager, but you cant (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Feb 16, 15:42:35
- blindasabat (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 16, 15:37:46
- Charles21 (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 16, 15:40:42
- my point is (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 16, 15:41:40
- 'we'? (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 16, 15:43:39
- 21 of us (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 16, 15:46:00
- I wouldn't be concerned Charles, I'm Jizzer. (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Feb 16, 15:46:58
- 21 of us (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 16, 15:46:00
- 'we'? (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 16, 15:43:39
- my point is (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 16, 15:41:40
- so why isnt he on the bench though (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 16, 15:40:10
- Charles21 (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 16, 15:40:42
- No he should be in the 16 whatever. He can play up front, on the wing he's dangerous (n/m) (NCFC) - greendude, Feb 16, 15:42:21
- alleluya (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 16, 15:32:12
- and I agree as well - see, you can provide reasoned opinion. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 16, 15:33:03
- ... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 16, 15:36:16
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.