Paterson with both I see!
Posted By: Brandonio on February 15th 2008 at 20:54:19
Message Thread
- Blimey...Scunthorpe 2 nil up at Stoke HT (n/m) (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 15, 20:53:27
- we arnt safe yet then (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 15, 20:54:34
- We should have won Tuesday night and would have had we been more attacking. (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Feb 15, 21:40:45
- could say we may have lost as well (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 15, 21:42:58
- Every played Risk? There wasn't one tuesday night. (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Feb 15, 21:45:01
- Don't know if I've ever seen a team work as hard as Hull (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 15, 21:44:25
- Agreed - absolutely no time on the ball whatsoever. Think it came as a real (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 15, 22:01:35
- could say we may have lost as well (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 15, 21:42:58
- Another way of looking at is that we've got a chance to close on Stoke.... (n/m) (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 15, 20:55:27
- that's won't happen either! Charlton in 5th on 51pts are 9pts ahead (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 15, 20:56:42
- I was only trying to counteract Selwyn's equally ludicrous pessimism ;-) (n/m) (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 15, 20:58:17
- ha yeh I guess so! (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 15, 20:59:15
- I was only trying to counteract Selwyn's equally ludicrous pessimism ;-) (n/m) (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 15, 20:58:17
- that's won't happen either! Charlton in 5th on 51pts are 9pts ahead (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 15, 20:56:42
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 15, 20:54:55
- We should have won Tuesday night and would have had we been more attacking. (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Feb 15, 21:40:45
- Paterson with both I see! (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 15, 20:54:19
- we arnt safe yet then (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 15, 20:54:34
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.