i'm guessing here, but is Gibbs a little more defensively minded than Hucks?
if so, then with Roeder's preferred tactic of only going with the one wide player, isn't it more a case of Croft keeping Hucks out of the team?
Posted By: blindasabat on February 12th 2008 at 22:43:43
Message Thread
- great news bates is injured (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 12, 22:10:39
- not impressed by him today... early days mind (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 12, 22:20:01
- i'm glad we agree (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 12, 22:21:50
- He was fucking shit (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 22:18:54
- Amen brother (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 12, 22:39:24
- we put ourselves under pressure to play him (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 22:22:28
- Indeed - Wenger obviously wants him to play (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 22:24:30
- i'm guessing here, but is Gibbs a little more defensively minded than Hucks? (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 12, 22:43:43
- No, he's not - he's a skinny little kid (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 22:50:40
- has Roeder ever played Hucks down the left in any case? (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 22:45:09
- really? (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 12, 22:50:56
- presumably he looked good enough in training so Roeder told his arsenal pals (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 22:28:49
- i'm guessing here, but is Gibbs a little more defensively minded than Hucks? (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 12, 22:43:43
- Indeed - Wenger obviously wants him to play (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 22:24:30
- I wasn't at the game (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 12, 22:21:17
- He's a kid in to do a man's job against a tough team (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 22:23:24
- We are too negative at home (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 12, 22:25:05
- He's a kid in to do a man's job against a tough team (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 22:23:24
- Bates was well at fault against Cardiff too (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 22:20:57
- gibbs ahead of hucks is pretty scandalous (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 12, 22:20:26
- We knew the shit would fly............................. (NCFC) - usacanary, Feb 12, 22:24:44
- Yes, but we didn't need a left sided player (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 22:26:03
- that's a valid point (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 22:30:57
- Yes, but we didn't need a left sided player (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 22:26:03
- We knew the shit would fly............................. (NCFC) - usacanary, Feb 12, 22:24:44
- I agree with that (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 22:11:31
- oh dear (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 12, 22:14:29
- Sorry, I don't want scum playing for us (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 22:15:04
- but he is so why not support him? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 12, 22:16:05
- Same as I'd be if we signed Muscat (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 22:16:46
- but he's nothing like Muscat (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 12, 22:18:48
- yeah, muscat had the body to injure and survive (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 22:28:50
- Bates' career is on borrowed time (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Feb 12, 22:29:19
- yeah, muscat had the body to injure and survive (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 22:28:50
- but he's nothing like Muscat (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 12, 22:18:48
- Same as I'd be if we signed Muscat (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 22:16:46
- what do you think of glenn for signing him (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 12, 22:15:50
- but he is so why not support him? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 12, 22:16:05
- Sorry, I don't want scum playing for us (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 22:15:04
- oh dear (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 12, 22:14:29
- not impressed by him today... early days mind (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 12, 22:20:01
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.