It is more likely to be because he is very unimaginative

and finds that the easiest form of discourse is the abuse of others

Posted By: Old Git on January 23rd 2008 at 12:30:20

Message Thread

CarrowRoeder, you have been charged with being an ex Waveny Councillor, how do you plead? (n/m) (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Jan 23, 12:21:48
- Guilty as charged (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 23, 12:23:48
- a fucking shit one at that! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:22:38
  - I'm due in at work at 2pm, I thought I best tell you, incase I log out (NCFC) - pants, Jan 23, 12:25:26
  - Are you always so offensive? Is it really neccassarrryyy? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 23, 12:24:54
    - Yes, and no (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 23, 12:26:26
      - Thought so - is it because he's (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 23, 12:27:18
        
        It is more likely to be because he is very unimaginative (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 23, 12:30:20
        
        Mmm, he does seem a very angry person. Still, we all have (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 23, 12:37:52
        
        exactly (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:39:11
        
        Be my guest (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 23, 12:44:30
        
        don't let him, he'll nick all your towels... (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 23, 12:48:38
        
        i've never once denied being a cunt (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:28:00
        
        Inded, but does that make it necessary to refer to others as one? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 23, 12:28:58
        
        where did i call him a cunt?! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:30:06
        
        I was talking generally (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 23, 12:32:15
        
        It's just not worth it cb41, no one really knows the malfunction (NCFC) - pants, Jan 23, 12:40:15
    - he was removed as a councillor due to never attending (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:25:45
      - Have you asked him why though ? Perhaps there was a perfectly reasonable explaination. (NCFC) - Arganth, Jan 23, 12:29:43
        
        i have asked him yes (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:30:32
        
        Where ? And what was his response ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Jan 23, 12:32:37
        
        he hasn't responded (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:32:55
        
        Ah. Guilty then. (NCFC) - Arganth, Jan 23, 12:34:10
        
        surely he could have responded here? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:35:57
      - Why? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 23, 12:29:25
        
        because he's taking the piss out of tax payers! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:32:00
        
        Christ, if that bothers you, no wonder you are an angry bloke. (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 23, 12:33:31
        
        you are seriously lacking moral fibre (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:34:10
        
        How on earth do you deduce that? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 23, 12:35:27
        
        with my mind... (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:36:49
        
        Ah, right. "Whatever" is the in vogue response, I gather. (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 23, 12:38:49
        
        is it? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 12:39:27
      - haha (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 23, 12:28:16

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.