exactly

they signed Davenport last year and loaned him straight out - why not Routledge? (though of course he might say that if he was going to be loaned back to a Fizzy team he might as well have stayed at palace)

Posted By: mr carra on July 27th 2005 at 14:18:16

Message Thread

Routledge (NCFC) - Pekey_PK, Jul 27, 13:54:28
- are you IED in disguise ? :) (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Jul 27, 14:18:41
- Not a cat in hell chance given that he signed for Spurs for ?2.5m this summer !!! (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Jul 27, 14:17:48
- haven't spurs just signed him? (n/m) (NCFC) - Wotb Big Boy, Jul 27, 14:07:32
  - exactly (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 27, 14:18:16
    - routledge is the nuts though (n/m) (NCFC) - Wotb Big Boy, Jul 27, 14:26:32
- how about SWP? (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jul 27, 13:56:29
  - I'm sure we would (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jul 27, 14:01:18
    - these "new rules" are an urban myth (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 27, 14:20:06
      - I was being ironic ... (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jul 27, 14:34:31
    - what are these new rules? and how come blake was allowed to go to leeds? (n/m) (NCFC) - Wotb Big Boy, Jul 27, 14:11:57
    - damn those new rules (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jul 27, 14:02:18

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.