No he wants £1 million a year wages and a 3 year contract
Posted By: CarrowRoeder on January 17th 2008 at 19:56:00
Message Thread
- havin a laugh (NCFC) - cityfc, Jan 17, 19:46:16
- The problem with Tiny is not just transfer fee its his wage demands as well, we could buy (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 19:51:45
- But wasn't that all agreed before he went back after his loan? (NCFC) - DICKY, Jan 17, 19:54:30
- Well he's good - but not worth circa £20k a week (n/m) (NCFC) - DICKY, Jan 17, 19:57:45
- totally agree, if the £20k a week thing is true, we need look elsewhere (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 17, 20:52:16
- No he wants £1 million a year wages and a 3 year contract (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 19:56:00
- ... (NCFC) - Five guys named Creo, Jan 17, 20:22:54
- More a year than most top executives to play in the bottom of the Fizzy ? You're (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 17, 20:04:10
- I can promise you thats what he wants, Scouts honour (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 20:07:04
- info (NCFC) - cityfc, Jan 17, 19:57:58
- Well as far as I know thats the problem at the moment but it is still ongoing (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 20:00:56
- Roeder said the wages were not a problem?? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 17, 20:34:38
- Might not be to him but they are to some (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 20:36:35
- I find it a tad sad that we cannot afford to pay the going rate (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 17, 20:39:27
- What £20K a week thats alot for someone not thought up to Prem standard (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 20:42:49
- I was more talking about the 1 million fee (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 17, 20:47:57
- They would meet the transfer fee if they had to, its wages thats the problem (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 20:54:05
- I find that hard to beleive, considering what has been said (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 17, 20:57:33
- Well thats the truth, and its not like I am giving some breaking news transfer bollox its (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 21:01:50
- actually thinling about it I don't (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 17, 21:01:41
- I find that hard to beleive, considering what has been said (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 17, 20:57:33
- They would meet the transfer fee if they had to, its wages thats the problem (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 20:54:05
- I was more talking about the 1 million fee (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 17, 20:47:57
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 17, 20:39:58
- agreed about the wages however, £20K a week is far too much to pay (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 17, 20:49:45
- What £20K a week thats alot for someone not thought up to Prem standard (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 20:42:49
- I find it a tad sad that we cannot afford to pay the going rate (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 17, 20:39:27
- Might not be to him but they are to some (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 20:36:35
- Roeder said the wages were not a problem?? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 17, 20:34:38
- Well as far as I know thats the problem at the moment but it is still ongoing (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 20:00:56
- Well he's good - but not worth circa £20k a week (n/m) (NCFC) - DICKY, Jan 17, 19:57:45
- But wasn't that all agreed before he went back after his loan? (NCFC) - DICKY, Jan 17, 19:54:30
- you will be right regarding the left overs (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Jan 17, 19:48:11
- The problem with Tiny is not just transfer fee its his wage demands as well, we could buy (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 17, 19:51:45
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.